intentionally failing to disclose evidencein a case that sent an innocent man,Michael Morton, to prison for the murder of his wife. When trying the case as a prosecutor, Anderson possessed evidence that may have cleared Morton, includingstatementsfrom the crime ' s only eyewitness that Morton wasn ' t the culprit. Anderson sat on this evidence, and then watched Morton get convicted. While Morton remained in prison for the next 25 years, Anderson ' s career flourished, and he eventually became a judge. In today ' s deal, Anderson pled to criminal contempt, and will have to give up his law license, perform 500 hours of community service, and spend 10 days in jail. Anderson had alreadyresigned in Septemberfrom his position on the Texas bench. What makes today ' s plea newsworthy is not that Anderson engaged in misconduct that sent an innocent man to prison. Indeed, while most prosecutors and police officers are ethical and take their constitutionalobligations seriously, government misconduct - - including disclosure breaches known as Brady violations - - occurs so frequently that it has become one of thechief causesof wrongful conviction. What ' s newsworthy and novel about today ' s plea is that a prosecutor was actually punished in a meaningful way for his transgressions. I give speeches about the Innocence Movement, and tell stories from real cases, all around the world. No matter where I am, when I finish speaking the first question usually is, " What happened to the police / prosecutors who did this to the poor guy? " The answer is almost always, " Nothing, " or worse, " The police officer was promoted and now is the chief of his department. " The adage that the powerful go unpunished is no truer or more visible than with police officers and prosecutors in America - - even when they send innocent people to prison from their misconduct. My clientRoger Dean Gillispieof Dayton, Ohio, for example, spent 20 years in prison as a result of police misconduct. In 2007, we presented overwhelming evidence that the police officers, like Anderson in the Morton case, failed to turn over evidence to the defense before trial that would have cleared Gillispie. We also supplied the court with evidence that the police officer in charge had harassed and intimidated witnesses helpful to the defense, and had manipulated the evidence. Before going to court to clear Gillispie, we met with the local prosecutors, hopeful that they wouldn ' t tolerate such misconduct and would do a thorough(and neutral) investigation to get to the truth. Instead, they simply denied everything in knee - jerk fashion, and fought to keep Gillispie in prison until a federal court finally found government misconduct andthrew out his chargesin December 2011. To this day, the police officer in the case has not been investigated by a neutral, independent body. The only thing he has received is promotions. Rogue cops and prosecutors going unpunished is the rule rather than the exception. In Illinois, two police officers whose improperly grueling interrogation techniques led to the wrongful conviction of Juan Rivera and others were not penalized when their 3rd degree tactics came to light. Rather, they were recently hired at taxpayer expense toteach interrogation coursesto other police officers around the state. A recent study found prosecutorial misconduct innearly one - quarterof all capital cases in Arizona. Only two of those prosecutors have been reprimanded or punished. This led theArizona Republicto conclude:
There seldom are consequences for prosecutors, regardless of whether the miscarriage of justice occurred because of ineptness or misconduct. In fact, they are often congratulated.